Discussion about this post

User's avatar
NickD's avatar

This is an international and one of the most important of the 4 grand slam tournaments where the organizers must make sure that the athletes are in good health and not contaminated and also take measures to protect them from contamination.

So, if a tennis player has 3 dozes of vaccine and is also contaminated with the virus it's ok to allow the player to participate in the tournament, but if a player is not contaminated and is not vaccinated should not be allowed to participate.

Does that really make sense to you?

I admire Djokovic not only because is the best tennis player in the world, but also for position on human rights, his honesty, dignity and principles things that are very rare to find in a person nowadays.

I hope his message will wake up the corrupted minds who enforce these inhuman measures of unreasonable lockdowns, coercion, censorship, useless vaccine passports that did and do more harm than good, creating mass fear and psychosis responsible for more deaths than COVID-19 virus itself.

Shame on Australia government who can enforce such inhuman rules not only on its citizens, but also to an international event.

Novak, you are a wonderful soul and you are a winner already.

Expand full comment
Disillusioned Lawyer's avatar

Australia are treating a 34 year old elite athlete, in peak physical condition, who spends most of his time outdoors, and has virtually zero chance of being ill with Covid, as a health risk.

He's not a health risk; nor is he a risk to hospital resources. He's just a challenge to the authority of incompetent, authoritarian, and small minded politicians.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts