Oh so Mark is censored because he didn't have an opposing view in order properly to debate yet we are not allowed to debate because we hold an opposing view?
Pfff.
Yes, it's clear. And it is so very, very wrong.
And more people can see it for what it is. We hope.
Mar 13, 2023·edited Mar 13, 2023Liked by Jeffrey Peel
MS has pulled back the curtain on every single topic that, during his tenure at GBN, MSM have decided they cannot , should not or will not cover because the downside of their erstwhile journalistic integrity being wheeled out ( again, or for the first time, take your pick) - is simply to damaging to 'them' - loss of licence, advertising revenue, public censorship via Twatterverse, ostracising by the 'Blob', all of them and more. GB News output is evidently being worked from "behind" by the CEO as much as any so called editorial restraint.
Ofcom's culpability is, imho, very obvious; their main stated reason for upholding the complaint against TMSS/GBN was because the ONS diktat that their data presentation should not be used to make cogent judgments about the effect of these GT mRNA experimental drugs on mortality and other stats - which is precisely what MS did, as well as Profs Hennigan and Fenton and others have done to devastating effect; since when did the ONS have any credibility to sanction how their SARS COV2/CV19 data should be analysed? FFS, the stats Regulator has hauled them over the coals for less than professionally ethical behaviour with previous egregiously prepared output. It is very very wrong and shows how the UK has become a satellite of CCP style control.
However I feel what Ofcom have done can be called the Lineker effect; just as the now evidently ignorant footballer has displayed to the entire world he knows precisely diddley squat about 1930's Nazi Germany, he has encouraged a raft of other "football" people to demonstrate they are equally as thick as he is which might otherwise have gone unnoticed - so one ill or nil thought out disclosure serves to highlight loads of "others" which might have gone unnoticed if he had kept his mouth shut. So I say "THANKS GARY" continue to demonstrate your leftie ignorance and lets see more of your acolytes come out of the woodwork "in support" of world class crass ignorance - and "THANKS OFCOM", keep your biased judgments coming and we will keep tally of all those instances of evident bias you ignore - as has been illustrated by many people already.
I think you're right that the Lineker story has helped highlight the sheer lack of any non-lefty/Woke opinion anywhere in the BBC. Ironically, it may help to show inherent BBC institutional bias - if anyone has missed it to date.
Spot on. And this is why I will no longer watch or listen to any media censored by Ofcom. It’s a simple blanket rule which now unfortunately excludes GB news which I enthusiastically watched for six months. But life is full and rich and well-informed outside of the mainstream.
They are 💩 who are Ofcom but another authoritarian quango .... while GB news have Neil O they do at least point serious thoughts re the truth in the right direction for progress out of the mainstream sewer of lies and insanity aka government bbc itv - any ideas on Al-Jazeera or maybe they never really covered this?
I have heard favourable reports about Al Jazeera, but it has its own set of blind spots and biases based on who is paying the bills. I guess it is the whole idea of having curated, let alone censored news which I have fallen out of favour with. And I have fallen out of favour simply because of a lack of trust. Watching independently produced videos and reading loads of Substack content more than fills the MSM shaped hole in my life.
I agree - it’s just that if you happened to lose half your eyesight due to illegal house arrest and no “ophthalmic” help for 2 months then believe me tv is easier to see!
Yes. Exactly right. We (the public), through social media channels, corrupted mainstream media broadcasting and even newspapers, have been subjected to incessant fear porn, with little or no balance. I remember watching Luke Johnson on QT, where he made a rational argument that the lockdowns would cause more damage and deaths than the virus. He proved to be correct. Yet it was clear from the approach by Fiona Bruce, was that this was clearly not the agenda.
Oh so Mark is censored because he didn't have an opposing view in order properly to debate yet we are not allowed to debate because we hold an opposing view?
Pfff.
Yes, it's clear. And it is so very, very wrong.
And more people can see it for what it is. We hope.
MS has pulled back the curtain on every single topic that, during his tenure at GBN, MSM have decided they cannot , should not or will not cover because the downside of their erstwhile journalistic integrity being wheeled out ( again, or for the first time, take your pick) - is simply to damaging to 'them' - loss of licence, advertising revenue, public censorship via Twatterverse, ostracising by the 'Blob', all of them and more. GB News output is evidently being worked from "behind" by the CEO as much as any so called editorial restraint.
Ofcom's culpability is, imho, very obvious; their main stated reason for upholding the complaint against TMSS/GBN was because the ONS diktat that their data presentation should not be used to make cogent judgments about the effect of these GT mRNA experimental drugs on mortality and other stats - which is precisely what MS did, as well as Profs Hennigan and Fenton and others have done to devastating effect; since when did the ONS have any credibility to sanction how their SARS COV2/CV19 data should be analysed? FFS, the stats Regulator has hauled them over the coals for less than professionally ethical behaviour with previous egregiously prepared output. It is very very wrong and shows how the UK has become a satellite of CCP style control.
However I feel what Ofcom have done can be called the Lineker effect; just as the now evidently ignorant footballer has displayed to the entire world he knows precisely diddley squat about 1930's Nazi Germany, he has encouraged a raft of other "football" people to demonstrate they are equally as thick as he is which might otherwise have gone unnoticed - so one ill or nil thought out disclosure serves to highlight loads of "others" which might have gone unnoticed if he had kept his mouth shut. So I say "THANKS GARY" continue to demonstrate your leftie ignorance and lets see more of your acolytes come out of the woodwork "in support" of world class crass ignorance - and "THANKS OFCOM", keep your biased judgments coming and we will keep tally of all those instances of evident bias you ignore - as has been illustrated by many people already.
I think you're right that the Lineker story has helped highlight the sheer lack of any non-lefty/Woke opinion anywhere in the BBC. Ironically, it may help to show inherent BBC institutional bias - if anyone has missed it to date.
Spot on. And this is why I will no longer watch or listen to any media censored by Ofcom. It’s a simple blanket rule which now unfortunately excludes GB news which I enthusiastically watched for six months. But life is full and rich and well-informed outside of the mainstream.
They are 💩 who are Ofcom but another authoritarian quango .... while GB news have Neil O they do at least point serious thoughts re the truth in the right direction for progress out of the mainstream sewer of lies and insanity aka government bbc itv - any ideas on Al-Jazeera or maybe they never really covered this?
I have heard favourable reports about Al Jazeera, but it has its own set of blind spots and biases based on who is paying the bills. I guess it is the whole idea of having curated, let alone censored news which I have fallen out of favour with. And I have fallen out of favour simply because of a lack of trust. Watching independently produced videos and reading loads of Substack content more than fills the MSM shaped hole in my life.
I agree - it’s just that if you happened to lose half your eyesight due to illegal house arrest and no “ophthalmic” help for 2 months then believe me tv is easier to see!
I fear NO is next - he speaks the sanest "truths" (and I rarely disagree with him) and I suspect the "Blob" has him in their sights.
Depressingly you probably are - makes me so angry
Yes. Exactly right. We (the public), through social media channels, corrupted mainstream media broadcasting and even newspapers, have been subjected to incessant fear porn, with little or no balance. I remember watching Luke Johnson on QT, where he made a rational argument that the lockdowns would cause more damage and deaths than the virus. He proved to be correct. Yet it was clear from the approach by Fiona Bruce, was that this was clearly not the agenda.
Indeed. And here is Luke right here...expanding on the points he was making on QT. https://www.thenewera.uk/p/luke-johnson-on-tne
Thanks JP. Excellent post. OFCOM. Outlet For Cabbaged Officious Morons.