Brexiteers and The WEF
Remember Brexit? Do you remember some of the arguments made for the UK leaving the European Union? These focused, of course, on the merits of the United Kingdom taking back control of its justice system, sovereignty and borders. Many of the latest appointees to the Cabinet were prominent brexiteers - including the Foreign Secretary, James Cleverly. Mr Cleverly made clear his support for Brexit and Boris Johnson’s Brexit ‘deal’ and voted for the legislation that would allow the United Kingdom to ‘take back control’. Here he is putting on record his support for the passage of the legislation through the House of Commons.
But now, of course, questions are being asked about the role of another supra-national organisation - the World Economic Forum - in terms of its influence over national governments. In an infamous interview at the John F Kennedy School of Government (in February this year) Klaus Schwab boasted about how half of the Canadian Cabinet (and Justin Trudeau himself) were alumni of the Young Global Leaders programme.
Therefore, it’s no surprise that when the new Premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith, faced the media, she made special mention of the WEF. “I guess I find it distasteful when Billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders.”
Clearly this feels very like the situation prior to the Brexit vote (and during the campaign) when certain politicians expressed greater allegiance to the EU than the UK - and certain politicians made regular trips to Brussels to be briefed by EU officials on how to campaign to remain in the EU.The EU also mounted a considerable campaign of its own to discredit Brexit campaigners.
If the Conservative Premier of Alberta has concerns about WEF intervention in the national politics of Canada then I’d suggest that our Foreign Secretary, James Cleverly, should have similar concerns and should make clear his solidarity with a fellow Conservative, and elected Premier, in a sister Commonwealth nation.
It’s time for the UK government to make clear that the WEF has no business meddling in our affairs or attempting to plant its apparatchiks in our government. Of course, that may already be the case - and certain Cabinet members may have greater solidarity with the Great Reset project. It would be nice to know who they are. So over to the Foreign Secretary…
Declaration of interests from all Cabinet members would be insightful.
As you say, where and from whom did they receive leadership training---Tri-lateral commission,Common purpose,WEF etc
Follow their money.
It is beginning to dawn on me that the B.R.I.C.S countries (and their alliance partners) and the 'traditional' western economies may be more aligned than I originally thought? Gorbachev's reforms were all carried out under the watchful eye of the W.E.F. China (we know) had a highly successful 50 year plan as the cracks were beginning to appear in the Mao regime in the 1970's. India is a very far cry from when I was hacking about the country in the late 1980's (though even then - you could see change looming). I'm trying to look upon this whole 'global reset' as a negotiating opportunity, rather than just an opportunity to protest and pelt rocks. It's not (at all) easy as the main instrumental 'front line' soldiers of the reset are so monumentally narcissistic. However, that cannot deter us. We must remember SunZu. They really want anarchy and rebellion. That would be a dream come true. Military lockdown would immediately follow - including curfews - and that would lose any opportunity for negotiation for a generation. Look at any third-world country fresh out of a well-financed military coup as historical guidance on this issue? I think your point is salient Jeffrey. We need some answers. We need to find calm and fully legal instruments for getting those answers - all the way across the UK - with a coordinated approach. I'm saying all of this - I get as angry and vitriolic as anyone, but nothing is changing. Therefore the conclusion I am drawing is my approach is crap. Maybe my first port of call is to ask my M.P (who used to be the P.M) for a wider audience than the somewhat ineffective 15 minute 1:1's an M.P's clinic has used since year dot. I'm open to suggestions on how best to achieve this? Now might be the right time. She was clearly no fan of Boris Johnson.