WEF Puppets
Embedded politicians replace democracy
The World Economic Forum has been kicking around for many years. In my 20 years or so as a one-man-band consultant I’ve undertaken quite a few projects for globalist companies strutting their wares at Davos.
For example, PwC, the accounting and consulting giant, typically announces the results of its CEO survey at the annual Davos event. The findings have never exactly been earth shattering. The 2022 Report featured the title, “Reimagining the outcomes that matter.” Whatever that means.
NGOs, media people, corporate PRs, wannabes, schmooze around, occasionally rubbing shoulders at various junkets with people rich enough to have their own private jet fleet, rather than a seat on a leased one. And that very subject - the relative pecking order as far as access to the corporate PJ fleet is concerned - dominates many of the vacuous conversations by Davos man.
In January 2015 the then Conservative MEP, Dan Hannan, wrote an article for CapX about Davos-man. He noted…
“Most Right-wingers heartily dislike the Davos racket. The only reason we don’t demonstrate in the slush alongside the Occupy crowd is that most of us have jobs. We know in our bones that Davos Man despises us and our values. As Samuel Huntingdon once put it, the delegates “view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the élite’s global operations.”
It’s for this reason that the WEF took a strategic decision to put some of the politicians with the best prospects to ‘get on’ in politics - in various strategically important G7 jurisdictions - into its corporatist back-pocket.
Hannan, in that article I referred-to above, made another point that highlights the risks associated with the WEF providing the politicians with the ‘lines’, as they say in Whitehall. Because the WEF is very good at getting everything wrong. It probably comes from having to synthesise and homogenise the member bucket-list of interests. Remember, it’s only the world’s largest companies that get to sit at the Davos table. And the funding is pretty eye-watering. Schwab and the various staffers are merely the dancing puppets. The corporate members (about 1,200 or so of them) are the paymasters, trustees and grandees.
“Davos Man consistently gets the big calls wrong. In the 1970s, he was for prices and incomes policies. In the 1980s, he was for the ERM. In the 1990s, he was for the euro. In the 2000s, he was for the bank bailouts.” (Dan Hannan).
And now, of course, Davos people (men and women are no longer politically correct), are getting an awful lot of other things wrong. They’re wrong about the climate emergency nonsense. They’re wrong about the need for Net Zero. They were wrong about pandemic response. They’re wrong about central bank digital currencies and social credit.
Current Trustees include people like Larry Fink of Blackrock (that owns many of the corporate WEF ‘partners’ - AKA corporate beneficiaries of WEF gerrymandering); Christine Lagarde of the European Central Bank (and previously IMF) - chief advocate of the Central Bank quantitative easing Ponsi scheme; and Al Gore, the failed Presidential candidate and the world’s first “Green” billionaire.
Part of the reason why the WEF doesn’t really care about national boundaries (and wants to win as many national governments and oppositions as possible) is that political ideologies really are not relevant. Eradicate the borders, seek to achieve consistent policies across boundaries, and seek a de facto global government, then who cares about Conservatism, Communism or Fascism? Let’s just get the globalist show on the road.
One of the WEF’s chosen ones is none other than Rishi Sunak, who seems most likely to be chosen as Leader and Prime Minister after the demise of Liz Truss. As Kurt Zindulka noted in a Breitbart article back in July…
“The former Chancellor of the Exchequer, once a key ally of Boris Johnson who turned Brutus and sparked the downfall of his government, has nevertheless been seen as the candidate most closely aligned with Johnson’s ‘Build Back Better’ green agenda. While Communist China is the world’s top polluter, the East Asian powerhouse benefits massively from Western governments’ obsession with so-called green energy and net zero.
“Indeed, up to 40 per cent of Britain’s solar farms were reportedly constructed on the backs of slave labour in the region of Xinjiang, where millions of Uyghur Muslims and other ethnic minorities have been interned in concentration camps. China is also a major producer of the rare earth minerals required to operate the allegedly clean sources of energy. Cancer rates have soared in the surrounding areas of mines in China for neodymium, a magnetic material used in the production of wind turbines.”
But such issues rarely trouble the WEF. On they trudge. Ultimately they’ll get their man in place. Where, back in 2015, they were bit-part players in lobbying for the ERM or Remain, now they are essentially running governments with their own implanted people. And this effectively means that representative government is all but dead.
Perhaps remember that the next time you hear a protestor arguing for Net Zero or an end to fossil fuels. Ask yourself who’s paying, who’s pulling the strings and whether, just whether, there’s money in it for a WEF campaign corporate sponsor.