Tech safety is dictated by telecoms, meaning public health is at risk because of conflicts of interest at the WHO and ICNIRP (the body suggesting safety exposure guidelines) Tomorrow there is a zoom press conference on a new paper released by the ICBE-EMF or International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, which will discuss deep flaws in the recently completed 12 WHO commissioned systematic reviews on the health effects of EMFs from mobile communications. Register here: https://icbe-emf.org/new-paper-who-reviews-on-cell-phone-and-wireless-health-effects-provide-no-safety-assurance/ 7th October, 5.00pm BST. My substack has many articles with scientific references.
I appreciate that - but as the press conference on the WHO reviews is tomorrow, I thought I'd share at any opportunity. There is a huge issue for the 3.45 million electrosensitives in the UK.
An excellent initiative Jeff, resistance is key. I hope you get a good response.
Echo that.
Hakeem Anwar from Take Back Our Tech is doing good work on this.
https://tbot.substack.com/about
Perhaps collaboration across various groups could be something we achieve too. Thanks for the link.
I know what you mean:
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/what-the-nash-equilibrium-teaches
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/a-look-behind-the-veil-of-censorship
Tech safety is dictated by telecoms, meaning public health is at risk because of conflicts of interest at the WHO and ICNIRP (the body suggesting safety exposure guidelines) Tomorrow there is a zoom press conference on a new paper released by the ICBE-EMF or International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, which will discuss deep flaws in the recently completed 12 WHO commissioned systematic reviews on the health effects of EMFs from mobile communications. Register here: https://icbe-emf.org/new-paper-who-reviews-on-cell-phone-and-wireless-health-effects-provide-no-safety-assurance/ 7th October, 5.00pm BST. My substack has many articles with scientific references.
It's not quite the focus for this initiative Gillian. I know that the EMF issue is out there. But here I'm focusing on digital ID systems primarily.
I appreciate that - but as the press conference on the WHO reviews is tomorrow, I thought I'd share at any opportunity. There is a huge issue for the 3.45 million electrosensitives in the UK.